Sean O'Brien
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Podcasts
  • Contact

Why I've Stopped Reading

4/20/2023

0 Comments

 
I suppose that’s a bit hyperbolic, so let me calm you down right away. I’ve stopped only a certain kind of reading–in my case, reading of science-fiction. I read lots of nonfiction (Rachel Maddow’s Bag Man is one of my current books) and of course I read quite a lot in my profession as teacher (pedagogy, policy updates, student work, etc.).
But I find that I’m not reading science fiction anymore. The very thing I write. Why is that?

On the surface, I know why. I’m terrified of two things happening. First, I don’t want to read something that has existed for years (or worse, decades) that I am right now writing. That is, I don’t want confirmation that an idea I had–which I thought was unique to me–has been done before. This has already happened twice: My novel Beltrunner (the sequel to which I am editing now with the help of the kind and professional folks at EDGE Publishing) was, to me, something I’d not seen before. I know asteroid mining was and is a science fiction mini-trope, but that’s not the part I thought was different. I took as inspiration the excellent work Don Quixote as a model and worked from a similar premise. I had a stubbornly romantic hero, who had an enabling sidekick. He was chasing something that he himself could not really identify–an “impossible dream,” if you will. My difference was that I had him catch it. But the fingerprints of Quixote are all over my book–the main character’s companion is called Sancho, his ship is called the Dulcinea, and a small scouter vessel on that ship is called Rocinante (if you’re not familiar, those are the same names as Quixote’s partner, lover, and horse respectively). 

So there I was, feeling all smug and self-satisfied, that I’d managed to do something new.
 

Then I ran across the science fiction book and television series The Expanse.

The first book in the series, Leviathan Wakes, was published in 2011, five years before I published Beltrunner. I’d never heard of the book, nor the series, when I finished Beltrunner. But when I did, I looked it up. 

The main character is an ice miner in the asteroid belt. His ship is called the Rocinante. He discovers something he was not meant to find.

I was mortified. My first thought was that anyone who bothered to read Beltrunner would assume that I was writing a cheap knock-off of a very popular book series. Sure, there were some important distinctions: the Expanse series does not confine itself to a single protagonist but instead uses an ensemble approach. Also, they are slightly less interested in “hard” sci-fi than I am (there are a few inventions, such as speedy space flight, that I do not have). But the parallels that are there are numerous. I have assiduously avoided watching the television show (which I gather is extremely popular and has had a six-season run before ending recently) and will not be reading the novels anytime soon. Yes, I know I could read it to find the differences and soothe my aching soul that there is enough to discriminate one from the other, but I don’t feel like doing that just now.

I also had this happen on a trilogy I wrote about a small private college being whisked to an alternate earth unpopulated by human beings but where all those so transported develop strange new powers. Again, I felt this was a new idea until I heard of a series that did something very similar. I won’t go into the detail on that, but the feeling was the same. Twice now I wrote something that had already been done.

I know what you’re thinking: you’re going to quote Ecclesiastes 1:9 at me: “there is nothing new under the sun.” Or you’ll bring up the idea of character archetypes, or even Joseph Campbell’s monomyth idea. In short, you’ll try to remind me that there will always be some degree of shared worldbuilding or similarity of idea in fiction. “Just do what you do–don’t worry about what everyone else is doing.”

Fine advice. That brings me to why I’ve stopped reading. See, the best way I can think of to “not worry about what everyone else is doing” is to not know what everyone else is doing. Is that childish and small? Sure it is. I freely admit immaturity here. 

My second reason for putting down the science fiction is sort of the inverse of the first reason. I’ve become concerned–perhaps obsessed is more accurate–about being derivative in my writing. For those of you who don’t speak Late American Arrogant Pedantic, “derivative” means “taking what someone else has already done and kind of redoing it in a new skin.” It’s not quite “copying” but it is invited to that word’s family reunion cookouts. I dread reading something excellent and then letting that color my own writing.

Again, this flies in the face of all the expert advice I’ve read by many, many writers. “Good writers borrow. Great writers steal,” to quote T.S. Eliot. I’m sorry, Tommy, but I can’t go along with that. Maybe if I were much more talented I would dare to eat a peach, but as I am now, I don’t trust myself to read a greater work and not let it dominate me.
I mentioned earlier that Beltrunner gets some of its inspiration from Don Quixote, so I can understand your confusion, Dear Reader. How can I simultaneously say that I have loosely based that book on the other but then say I don’t want to be influenced? 
Let’s go to Uncle Walt for this: “Do I contradict myself? Very well then I contradict myself. (I am large, I contain multitudes.)”

Which reminds me…I need to lose weight.
​

Be seeing you!

0 Comments

Beltrunner: Aftermath Publishing Journey Part X

4/12/2023

0 Comments

 
Bit of a hiatus, there, folks (I’m very much trying to change from “guys” to “folks” to refer to a casual assemblage of people) but I’m back now. Blogging and also writing. Or unwriting.

Whahey? Unwriting? What’s that?

Well, I’m glad you asked. The editing process has been flensing away bits of story, plot, environment, setting, and so forth–my editor (with whom I think I work well) has a laser-focus on “moving the story forward” and I can appreciate that.

However (you knew there was going to be a “however,” didn’t you?) I took umbrage, got my hackles up, and was generally widdershins with a recent suggestion of hers. An exchange between my two main characters involved them discussing the nature of the soul.

SPOILERS AHEAD

One of the characters, Sancho, is the onboard computer for the other character’s (Collier) spaceship. Sancho the computer wondered if he had a soul, and engaged in a discussion with Collier for two or three pages about the notion. They never really arrived at a conclusion, and the plot picked up after the digression. They weren’t in a high-speed chase or fighting off space pirates at the time, but still, the story paused as the two of them discussed human and computer metaphysics.

My editor suggested cutting the scene because it didn’t move the story forward. To be fair, she is correct: plot demands were put on hold for several hundred words as these two talked. And to be fair again, she’s been on me about cutting away the nonessentials and getting to the story (quite a lot happens in the book–it’s not a quiet My Dinner with Andre in Space.) as quickly as possible. So there’s that.

I’ll quote Ray Bradbury here: “Digression is the soul of wit.” Yes, I’m aware that he himself is misquoting Shakespeare’s Polonius, but let that go. The detour my two characters take in discussing the nature of the soul is important to both of them, and I found I could not take it away from them. Sancho needs this for his growth, and in his own way, Collier does too. They need to talk about these things–neither one of them has anyone else they can talk to in this manner, and I find a computer wondering if it has a soul to be an interesting question. I mean, when you come right down to it–what even is a soul? How do you know you have one? Do animals have them? Do plants? Bacteria? Or is it only human beings? What about a human being who is part machine? A person with an artificial heart? Where IS the soul in your body? And on and on and on…

So sure, the plot had to pause while these two friends talked. But I think it’s important. Yes, yes, moving from plot point A to point B is also important (someone should tell Faulkner that so Addie Bundren’s goddam casket can finally get to Jefferson) but if the people doing the traveling don’t get a chance to tell their stories, what’s the point?

Be seeing you!

​
0 Comments

Beltrunner: Aftermath Publishing Journey Part IX

2/9/2023

0 Comments

 
A sculpture is already in the block of stone--the artist's work is to remove that which is not the finished product until only the figure remains.

Harder than it sounds, and I'm not even a sculptor.

It turns out that removing parts of the novel can be difficult. I'm finding that it's strangely easier to delete entire scenes than it is to merely trim something here or there. From this process, I understand why some directors release longer, extended versions of their films: they resent the cutting process that the studio makes necessary. Cutting is important--narrative flow is a thing, capturing and maintaining reader interest is a thing--but it's still damn difficult.

When the editor suggests a cut, it can be hard not to take it personally and think that she's telling me that my writing is awful and the less of it there is, the better. I'm sure editors lament to one another that these damn writers feel as if every single word of theirs is golden and sacred and the merest hint of removal would cause the edifice of the story to collapse.

It's also true that there's been somewhat of a trend recently towards "more is more" in fantasy and science fiction: huge epics of several hundred thousand words are in vogue, whereas the slim novel is a quaint throwback to a lesser time. But when you think of some of the great, seminal works, quite often they are brief and tight. 

So, it is not without precedent that I sally forth and return to the surgery of improvement on my beloved child. This won't hurt a bit...

​Be seeing you!
0 Comments

"Beltrunner: Aftermath" Publishing Journey Part VIII

1/14/2023

0 Comments

 
Many science fiction and fantasy writers have created entire worlds or even universes in which their characters tell their stories. The list is quite long–J.R.R. Tolkien’s Middle Earth has become so ingrained in the fantasy consciousness that it’s hard to imagine a time in fantasy literature where there weren’t elves, hobbits, and orcs. More recently, J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter universe took the world by storm with its rich history and detail. In science fiction, creations like Star Wars and Star Trek have endured for decades and show no signs of fading away.

Less well-known series by countless writers that span multiple books flourish in all sub-genres of science fiction, both in print and on the silver and small screens. The idea of a consistent universe is not at all a new one.


But it’s new to me.


Beltrunner II: Aftermath is my first true sequel. While it’s true I’ve written a trilogy (The
Moth series) that was always a very long story told in three books. In the Moth series, I had the entire sweep of the story plotted out from beginning to end, so breaking it up into three novels was more just an organizational tool than anything else. Aftermath was written several years after Beltrunner was done–more importantly, I felt Beltrunner was done done. When I finished it, I very much thought Collier’s story (and Sancho’s, for that matter) had been told, and I started working a completely unrelated novel (Silent Manifest, which was published a few years ago). 


When I was convinced to revisit the Beltrunner
story, it took me a while to come up with a new story. I managed to do so, and wrote Aftermath. What became apparent rather quickly, though, was that Aftermath had some places where it was out of alignment with facts and lore established in Beltrunner. There were inconsistencies and areas where things didn’t seem to line up properly. My first task in this editing process, then, was to reexamine Beltrunner and fully understand the lore I myself had created so I could bring Aftermath into agreement with it.


You may be thinking, “how can you have forgotten your own lore?” Well, it’s easy. Because I moved on. I wrote a different book, and indeed am over 60,000 words into a draft of yet another unrelated one. Just because I wrote the bloody thing doesn’t mean I actually remember all the details.


Now that I am looking at Beltrunner, I am amazed at just how many throwaway lines I have in it that need to be codified into some kind of Beltrunner Bible. In an effort to make the story rich and give the feeling of a fully realized world (or universe), I made several off-the-cuff comments about this or that which now I have to align with Aftermath. Certainly, not everything needs to be revisited, but if I described an item as having such-and-such dimensions, I have to stick with those dimensions in the second book. Little details of lore end up mattering. Looking back, if I had known Beltrunner
was going to have a sequel (and if my publisher has his way, an entire series) I would have been more careful in crafting the world.

It’s as if I’m looking at some other writer (me, but a past version of myself) and trying to write some fanfiction while keeping the lore intact. I even had a daydream about building scale models of the spaceship my main character uses, Dulcinea, so I can more accurately describe it. I could design a wiki for the Beltrunner universe so I can keep everything straight. I might need a clothesline slung in my study so I can clip note cards in a timeline to keep things in order. 
It’s interesting work, no doubt, but I do find myself cursing my slightly younger self for being so haphazard with lore. 
What’s worse is that even Aftermath was written as if THAT was the end of the story, and already my publisher wants a third one. So I might have to do this all over again.
I suppose a wiser man would have learned from this, but hey…I’m just beginning to figure out how to do this “writing” thing.
Be seeing you!

0 Comments

Speaking Professionally...

1/11/2023

0 Comments

 
Very much enjoyed conducting a professional development session with my colleagues at school today.

I got to circulate around the room and listen to other people who've chosen the same profession as I have discuss some deep thoughts regarding pedagogy and methodology in order to improve the lives of young people. 

To put that another way, we talked about how to be better teachers, and that talk was not "fluffy" or "feel-good" stuff, nor was it full of buzzwords devoid of meaning but which look good on a Google Slides presentation. We talked about implementation of strategies designed to increase our effectiveness. We talked about specific and technical changes we could make to some of our practice to help students master material and skills.

There's this common and pernicious belief that teaching is something anyone could do--that it's not a highly developed skill with multiple aspects, but rather a kind of glorified babysitting job. 

These people with whom I work are not only passionate folks who have dedicated their professional lives to the betterment of others, but are also highly skilled, intelligent and thoughtful artisans who know what they're doing. Teaching is somewhere between art and science, existing in the nebulous interstice where talent and training combine. Not anyone can be a teacher, and not any teacher can be a great one. It takes some qualities inherent in a person, like patience and selflessness, but also requires training in pedagogy and methodology.

I am proud to call all my colleagues in teaching brothers and sisters. 

​Be seeing you!
0 Comments

"Beltrunner: Aftermath" Publishing Journey Part VII

1/9/2023

0 Comments

 
We all say we want people to be honest with us, but that's kind of a lie, isn't it?

See, when an artist submits her or his work for consideration--an artist has a gallery show, an actor has a play, a writer has a book--we all say to our audiences, "Now, tell me honestly--how was it?" But what we're really saying is, "tell me you like it and therefore like me and tell me everything wonderful about it and then maybe if you absolutely have to mention something that wasn't divinely perfect."

Okay, maybe I am exaggerating slightly, but not much. 

All this is prelude to mentioning that I have my first round of edits to Aftermath from the editor at EDGE Publishing. Turns out it is the same person who edited Silent Manifest, so we've worked together before. Of course, me being myself, I did not recognize her name and introduced myself. She gracefully mentioned we'd already worked together. So strike one on Your Humble Narrator.

The edits are direct and blunt, which is of course the best way to do them, but I have to confess an initial sting to reading them. Is that immature on my part? Of course. A mature person can still be immature from time to time. 

But the worst thing about the edits is that at least one of them--something that is, if not fundamental to both novels, at least very significant--is absolutely correct. I won't get into specifics in this post, but suffice to say the editor saw through the socio-emotional shell game I think I was playing and called the story out on it. 

How DARE she be so right and so direct? Doesn't she know she's supposed to fawn over the Mighty Author and bask in the radiant glory of my prose for forty days and nights before she has the TEMERITY to suggest it may fall short of perfection?

Lest you think I am a literary pushover who cannot or will not fight for his own point of view, there are other edits I do not think are justified: I'll explain my point of view secure in the knowledge that the editor is a professional and will listen.

It's refreshing to know, however, that I will be working with someone who is by no means afraid to point out weaknesses in my story--we both want to improve it to make it the best it can be. Perhaps, in some imagined future, I'll be able to submit manuscripts that are taken by publishers "as is," but for now, I am eager to see how I can improve Aftermath.

And it will only sting a little bit!

Be seeing you!
0 Comments

"Beltrunner: Aftermath" Publishing Journey Part VI

12/13/2022

0 Comments

 
From what I gather, Stephen King does not like Stanley Kubrick's film for his work, The Shining. Kubrick made some changes and had a vision perhaps different from what King had. Those of you who have seen the film probably agree it is a masterpiece of cinema on every level: one of the best horror movies of all time. But it's not the novel.

I bring this up because the lovely folks at EDGE Publishing have been hard at work with the proposed cover for Beltrunner II: Aftermath and have sent me some proofs and drafts to discuss. It's a fascinating process--I'll tell you my experience with it: I'm not claiming this is how it works with everything, but...well, let me just get on with it.

Without going into too much detail about the cover, let me say that the scene depicted there is indeed one which happens in the story, more or less. I say "more or less" because some of the details are not quite as I pictured them, and some artistic choices were made that are factually wrong from a scientific standpoint. But I couldn't be happier with the choices made.

The artist did much more than simply draw or paint the scene as written. The artist seemed to use the scene to capture a tone, a feeling, that very much matches the tone I was trying to strike in the novel. In my mind, that's a lot harder. And it's also more rewarding. To see that the artist had the feel of the work was much more fulfilling than if the artist had simply translated words to images.

I think that's probably true in any adaptation. The writer's words exist in a certain medium that uses none of the five senses (yes, I know the reader has to use their eyes to see the words, but they can't see the story with their eyes). In a novel, the story has no existence in the physical world. It is wholly a concept. Once it becomes a picture, or a radio show, or a movie, it has color, and shape, and even sound. Whatever those sights and sounds are, they "fix" the story in place. 

Have you ever read a novel, especially a fantasy one, and then seen a movie of that same novel? And you hear a character's name pronounced very differently than you were pronouncing it in your own mind? My friend Steve and I had that happen many times with Frank Herbert's Dune and the subsequent David Lynch movie of the same name. The same thing happened with regard to the way characters looked. (I love me some Patrick Stewart, but I did not see him as a Gurney Halleck!) 

What I'm getting at is that when an artist has to try and move a concept into a reality, they have to make choices. I know there is some ambiguity in the visual arts, but nowhere near the same level as there is in the written ones. The artist who designed the cover for Beltrunner II: Aftermath had the difficult task of capturing not only a scene but a feeling, without ever having met me or even communicating with me. That they were able to do so is a credit to their skill.

As soon as the cover is finalized and official, I'll be able to show it to you elsewhere on this site, and you can take a look for yourself!

Be seeing you!

0 Comments

You Know You've Got 'Em When...

12/5/2022

0 Comments

 
...you're driving to work carrying on a conversation with them as if it were the most natural thing in the world.

I'm talking about characters.

So there I was, driving to work as I always do. Y'know how you drive to work for the umpteenth time to the point that you're not even using your conscious mind to do it? The drive is so automatic, so routine, that you could probably do it with just your autonomic brain functions? It was one of those kinds of drives.

And I found, almost at my destination, that I had been carrying on a conversation with the two women who comprise the main and primary/secondary characters in the novel I'm working on at present.

I've said this before, but for me, I know I've got 'em when I can hear 'em. Not see them--for some reason, I don't go in for the visuals as much as the sounds of my characters. But once I can hear them talking, using their own timbre and diction, I know I've got 'em.

Just a quick one today.

​Be seeing you!
0 Comments

NaNoWriMo 2022 Done!

12/1/2022

0 Comments

 
And another NaNoWriMo in the bag, folks. This was a little unusual, since the football team I help coach went two games into the postseason (it was the best season our school has ever had: an undefeated regular season of 10-0, a league championship, and a Division III quarterfinal appearance--congratulations Chris Varner!) so I got off to a slow start. Each day matters in NaNoWriMo, so I found myself suddenly in a deficit that meant I needed over 2,000 words a day.

I have to admit, it could be argued I cheated this time. How do you cheat at a self-imposed deadline? Well, the purest iteration of NaNoWriMo is to write 50,000 words of a new novel in the month of November. I wrote the third draft of a book I've been stuck on for over three years. 

This damn thing has been sitting on my brain for a helluva long time--so long, in fact, that I wrote Beltrunner: Aftermath just to get AWAY from the thing. at this point, I feel a little like a literary Ahab chasing down my white whale even if it ruins me. And I do a lot of my writing at Starbucks, just to complete the allusion.

So I've thrown away about 120,000 words of the story so far, which baffles the few students I talk to privately about writing. I like what Elie Wiesel said about writing and editing: "Writing is like a sculpture where you remove, you eliminate, in order to make the work visible. Even those pages you remove somehow remain." 

Anyhow, the 50,000 are done, and the story is in better shape than it's been in the first two tries. I feel as if I've avoided the cul-de-sacs that hurt me the first two times through, and now have a much better way forward. I guess we'll see. 

​Be seeing you!
0 Comments

NaNoWriMo 2022 Nearing Completion!

11/27/2022

0 Comments

 
After a slow start (the football season went gloriously long, and yet somehow, not long enough--great season, 'Cats!) I am nearly done with NaNoWriMo 2022!

If you're not aware (and why would you be?) of NaNoWriMo, it's National Novel Writing Month, a fun little challenge writers set themselves. The challenge is to write 50,000 words in the month of November on a novel. 

My first successful NaNoWriMo was in 2011, with "Stonethinker," then three years later in 2014 with "Chiron's Orphans," then two years later in 2016 with "Gift of the Moth," then 2017 with "Debt of the Moth," then 2018 with "Orcs Can't Play Quarterback," then 2019 with "Untitled Reality" then 2020 with "Beltrunner II: Aftermath," then 2021 with "Reality P.D." 

The current project--one on which that I am just over 43,000 words--is yet ANOTHER attempt at this "reality cop" story I've been working on for, well, as you can see, several years. 

Also of note is that my 2020 project is the same one that I signed the series contract for a few days ago. So in my case, yeah, NaNoWriMo does result in some published work!

Anyway, with just three days to go I've got about 7,000 words left! 

​Be seeing you!
0 Comments
<<Previous
Forward>>

    Author

    Hello to you. Glad to have you here. I'm going to write what I feel in this blog, and while I'm not going to go out of my way to offend you, neither am I going to hold back.

    Archives

    April 2025
    March 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    January 2024
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    April 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    May 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    July 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    August 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    December 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Site powered by Weebly. Managed by iPage
Photo from Kevin M. Gill